Which Animal Hair Lends Itself To Adding Fantasy Colors?

General appearance of an beast

A brilliantly-coloured oriental sweetlips fish (Plectorhinchus vittatus) waits while ii boldly-patterned cleaner wrasse (Labroides dimidiatus) pick parasites from its skin. The spotted tail and fin pattern of the sweetlips signals sexual maturity; the behaviour and pattern of the cleaner fish betoken their availability for cleaning service, rather than as prey

Vivid coloration of orange elephant ear sponge, Agelas clathrodes signals its biting gustatory modality to predators

Animate being coloration is the general advent of an fauna resulting from the reflection or emission of light from its surfaces. Some animals are brightly coloured, while others are difficult to see. In some species, such as the peafowl, the male has strong patterns, conspicuous colours and is iridescent, while the female is far less visible.

There are several carve up reasons why animals have evolved colours. Camouflage enables an animal to remain subconscious from view. Animals use color to annunciate services such as cleaning to animals of other species; to signal their sexual status to other members of the same species; and in mimicry, taking advantage of the warning coloration of another species. Some animals apply flashes of color to divert attacks by startling predators. Zebras may possibly use motion dazzle, confusing a predator's attack by moving a bold pattern chop-chop. Some animals are coloured for physical protection, with pigments in the skin to protect against sunburn, while some frogs can lighten or darken their skin for temperature regulation. Finally, animals can exist coloured incidentally. For example, blood is scarlet because the haem pigment needed to acquit oxygen is red. Animals coloured in these ways tin can accept hitting natural patterns.

Animals produce colour in both direct and indirect means. Direct production occurs through the presence of visible coloured cells known every bit pigment which are particles of coloured material such equally freckles. Indirect production occurs by virtue of cells known as chromatophores which are pigment-containing cells such as hair follicles. The distribution of the pigment particles in the chromatophores can change under hormonal or neuronal control. For fishes information technology has been demonstrated that chromatophores may respond directly to environmental stimuli like visible light, UV-radiation, temperature, pH, chemicals, etc.^[1] colour alter helps individuals in becoming more or less visible and is important in agonistic displays and in camouflage. Some animals, including many butterflies and birds, have microscopic structures in scales, bristles or feathers which requite them vivid iridescent colours. Other animals including squid and some deep-sea fish tin produce light, sometimes of different colours. Animals ofttimes use ii or more of these mechanisms together to produce the colours and effects they need.

History [edit]

Animal coloration has been a topic of interest and research in biology for centuries. In the classical era, Aristotle recorded that the octopus was able to change its coloration to friction match its background, and when it was alarmed.^[2]

In his 1665 book Micrographia, Robert Hooke describes the "fantastical" (structural, not pigment) colours of the Peacock's feathers:^[three]

The parts of the Feathers of this glorious Bird appear, through the Microscope, no less gaudy then practise the whole Feathers; for, as to the naked centre 'tis evident that the stalk or quill of each Feather in the tail sends out multitudes of Lateral branches, ... so each of those threads in the Microscope appears a large long body, consisting of a multitude of brilliant reflecting parts.
... their upper sides seem to me to consist of a multitude of thin plated bodies, which are exceeding thin, and lie very close together, and thereby, similar female parent of Pearl shells, do non onely reflect a very brisk low-cal, merely tinge that light in a most curious fashion; and by ways of diverse positions, in respect of the lite, they reflect back now one color, and then another, and those near vividly. Now, that these colours are onely fantastical ones, that is, such equally arise immediately from the refractions of the light, I plant past this, that water wetting these colour'd parts, destroy'd their colours, which seem'd to proceed from the alteration of the reflection and refraction.

—Robert Hooke^[3]

According to Charles Darwin'south 1859 theory of natural pick, features such as coloration evolved by providing individual animals with a reproductive reward. For example, individuals with slightly better camouflage than others of the same species would, on average, exit more offspring. In his Origin of Species, Darwin wrote:^[4]

When we see leaf-eating insects green, and bark-feeders mottled-gray; the alpine ptarmigan white in winter, the red-grouse the colour of heather, and the black-grouse that of peaty earth, we must believe that these tints are of service to these birds and insects in preserving them from danger. Grouse, if non destroyed at some flow of their lives, would increase in endless numbers; they are known to suffer largely from birds of prey; and hawks are guided past eyesight to their prey, so much so, that on parts of the Continent persons are warned not to keep white pigeons, equally existence the almost liable to destruction. Hence I can see no reason to doubt that natural selection might be most effective in giving the proper color to each kind of grouse, and in keeping that colour, when once acquired, truthful and abiding.

—Charles Darwin^[4]

Henry Walter Bates'southward 1863 book The Naturalist on the River Amazons describes his all-encompassing studies of the insects in the Amazon basin, and especially the collywobbles. He discovered that apparently like butterflies often belonged to different families, with a harmless species mimicking a poisonous or biting-tasting species to reduce its run a risk of beingness attacked past a predator, in the procedure now called after him, Batesian mimicry.^[v]

Edward Bagnall Poulton'due south strongly Darwinian 1890 book The Colours of Animals, their meaning and use, peculiarly considered in the case of insects argued the case for iii aspects of animal coloration that are broadly accepted today merely were controversial or wholly new at the time.^{[half dozen] [7]} It strongly supported Darwin's theory of sexual option, arguing that the obvious differences between male and female person birds such as the argus pheasant were selected by the females, pointing out that vivid male plume was found only in species "which court by twenty-four hours".^[8] The book introduced the concept of frequency-dependent selection, as when edible mimics are less frequent than the distasteful models whose colours and patterns they re-create. In the book, Poulton also coined the term aposematism for warning coloration, which he identified in widely differing animal groups including mammals (such as the skunk), bees and wasps, beetles, and collywobbles.^[viii]

Frank Evers Beddard's 1892 book, Animate being Coloration, acknowledged that natural selection existed but examined its awarding to camouflage, mimicry and sexual pick very critically.^{[9] [10]} The book was in turn roundly criticised by Poulton.^[11]

Abbott Handerson Thayer'southward 1909 book Concealing-Coloration in the Animal Kingdom, completed past his son Gerald H. Thayer, argued correctly for the widespread use of crypsis among animals, and in particular described and explained countershading for the beginning fourth dimension. However, the Thayers spoilt their case by arguing that camouflage was the sole purpose of animal coloration, which led them to merits that even the brilliant pinkish feather of the flamingo or the roseate spoonbill was cryptic—against the momentarily pinkish sky at dawn or dusk. As a result, the book was mocked by critics including Theodore Roosevelt as having "pushed [the "doctrine" of concealing coloration] to such a fantastic extreme and to include such wild absurdities as to call for the application of mutual sense thereto."^{[12] [13]}

Hugh Bamford Cott'southward 500-page book Adaptive Coloration in Animals, published in wartime 1940, systematically described the principles of cover-up and mimicry. The book contains hundreds of examples, over a hundred photographs and Cott's own accurate and artistic drawings, and 27 pages of references. Cott focussed specially on "maximum disruptive contrast", the kind of patterning used in military camouflage such as disruptive blueprint material. Indeed, Cott describes such applications:^[xiv]

the effect of a disruptive pattern is to break up what is really a continuous surface into what appears to exist a number of discontinuous surfaces... which contradict the shape of the body on which they are superimposed.

—Hugh Cott^[15]

Animal coloration provided important early evidence for evolution by natural selection, at a time when little straight evidence was bachelor.^{[16] [17] [18] [19]}

Evolutionary reasons for creature coloration [edit]

Camouflage [edit]

One of the pioneers of research into animal coloration, Edward Bagnall Poulton^[8] classified the forms of protective coloration, in a way which is still helpful. He described: protective resemblance; aggressive resemblance; adventitious protection; and variable protective resemblance.^[20] These are covered in turn below.

A inconspicuous orange oak leaf butterfly, Kallima inachus (middle) has protective resemblance.

Protective resemblance is used past prey to avoid predation. It includes special protective resemblance, now called mimesis, where the whole brute looks similar some other object, for example when a caterpillar resembles a twig or a bird dropping. In full general protective resemblance, now chosen crypsis, the animal's texture blends with the groundwork, for example when a moth's colour and pattern blend in with tree bark.^[20]

Aggressive resemblance is used by predators or parasites. In special aggressive resemblance, the animal looks similar something else, luring the prey or host to approach, for example when a bloom mantis resembles a particular kind of flower, such as an orchid. In general aggressive resemblance, the predator or parasite blends in with the background, for case when a leopard is difficult to run across in long grass.^[20]

For accidental protection, an animal uses materials such as twigs, sand, or pieces of trounce to conceal its outline, for instance when a caddis fly larva builds a decorated instance, or when a decorator crab decorates its back with seaweed, sponges and stones.^[xx]

In variable protective resemblance, an animal such as a chameleon, flatfish, squid or octopus changes its skin pattern and colour using special chromatophore cells to resemble whatever background it is currently resting on (as well as for signalling).^[20]

The main mechanisms to create the resemblances described by Poulton – whether in nature or in military applications – are crypsis, blending into the background and so as to become difficult to see (this covers both special and general resemblance); disruptive patterning, using color and pattern to break upwards the animal's outline, which relates mainly to general resemblance; mimesis, resembling other objects of no special involvement to the observer, which relates to special resemblance; countershading, using graded color to create the illusion of flatness, which relates mainly to general resemblance; and counterillumination, producing lite to match the groundwork, notably in some species of squid.^[20]

Countershading was starting time described past the American artist Abbott Handerson Thayer, a pioneer in the theory of animal coloration. Thayer observed that whereas a painter takes a apartment canvas and uses coloured pigment to create the illusion of solidity past painting in shadows, animals such as deer are often darkest on their backs, becoming lighter towards the belly, creating (as zoologist Hugh Cott observed) the illusion of flatness,^[21] and against a matching background, of invisibility. Thayer'south observation "Animals are painted by Nature, darkest on those parts which tend to be almost lighted by the sky's light, and vice versa" is chosen Thayer's Law.^[22]

Signalling [edit]

colour is widely used for signalling in animals every bit various every bit birds and shrimps. Signalling encompasses at least three purposes:

• advertising, to indicate a capability or service to other animals, whether inside a species or non
• sexual pick, where members of i sex choose to mate with suitably coloured members of the other sex, thus driving the evolution of such colours
• alarm, to bespeak that an creature is harmful, for example tin can sting, is poisonous or is biting-tasting. Warning signals may be mimicked truthfully or untruthfully.

Advertising services [edit]

Advertising coloration can point the services an animal offers to other animals. These may be of the same species, equally in sexual selection, or of different species, as in cleaning symbiosis. Signals, which oftentimes combine colour and movement, may be understood by many different species; for instance, the cleaning stations of the banded coral shrimp Stenopus hispidus are visited past dissimilar species of fish, and even by reptiles such every bit hawksbill ocean turtles.^{[23] [24] [25]}

Sexual selection [edit]

Darwin observed that the males of some species, such as birds-of-paradise, were very different from the females.

Darwin explained such male-female differences in his theory of sexual selection in his volume The Descent of Man.^[26] Once the females brainstorm to select males according to any particular characteristic, such as a long tail or a coloured crest, that characteristic is emphasized more than and more than in the males. Eventually all the males will have the characteristics that the females are sexually selecting for, as but those males can reproduce. This mechanism is powerful enough to create features that are strongly disadvantageous to the males in other ways. For example, some male birds-of-paradise take wing or tail streamers that are so long that they impede flight, while their vivid colours may make the males more vulnerable to predators. In the extreme, sexual selection may drive species to extinction, as has been argued for the enormous horns of the male Irish elk, which may have made it difficult for mature males to motility and feed.^[27]

Unlike forms of sexual selection are possible, including rivalry among males, and selection of females by males.

Warning [edit]

Alarm coloration (aposematism) is effectively the "opposite" of camouflage, and a special case of ad. Its function is to brand the beast, for case a wasp or a coral snake, highly conspicuous to potential predators, so that it is noticed, remembered, and and then avoided. Equally Peter Forbes observes, "Human alert signs utilize the same colours – cherry-red, yellow, blackness, and white – that nature uses to annunciate dangerous creatures."^[28] Alarm colours work by being associated by potential predators with something that makes the warning coloured animal unpleasant or unsafe.^[29] This can be achieved in several ways, past being whatsoever combination of:

• distasteful, for case caterpillars, pupae and adults of the cinnabar moth, the monarch and the variable checkerspot butterfly^[30] have bitter-tasting chemicals in their claret. Ane monarch contains more than plenty digitalis-like toxin to kill a cat, while a monarch extract makes starlings vomit.^[31]
• foul-smelling, for case the skunk tin can eject a liquid with a long-lasting and powerful smell^[32]
• aggressive and able to defend itself, for case honey badgers.^[33]
• venomous, for case a wasp can evangelize a painful sting, while snakes like the viper or coral snake can deliver a fatal bite.^[28]

Warning coloration can succeed either through inborn behaviour (instinct) on the role of potential predators,^[34] or through a learned abstention. Either can atomic number 82 to various forms of mimicry. Experiments testify that avoidance is learned in birds,^[35] mammals,^[36] lizards,^[37] and amphibians,^[38] just that some birds such as great tits have inborn avoidance of certain colours and patterns such as blackness and yellowish stripes.^[34]

Mimicry [edit]

The hawk-cuckoo resembles a predatory shikra, giving the cuckoo time to lay eggs in a songbird'southward nest unnoticed

Mimicry means that one species of animal resembles some other species closely enough to deceive predators. To evolve, the mimicked species must have alert coloration, because appearing to be bitter-tasting or dangerous gives natural choice something to work on. Once a species has a slight, hazard, resemblance to a alarm coloured species, natural selection can drive its colours and patterns towards more than perfect mimicry. There are numerous possible mechanisms, of which the best known are:

• Batesian mimicry, where an edible species resembles a distasteful or dangerous species. This is nearly common in insects such as butterflies. A familiar example is the resemblance of harmless hoverflies (which have no sting) to bees.
• Müllerian mimicry, where two or more distasteful or dangerous fauna species resemble each other. This is most common among insects such as wasps and bees (hymenoptera).

Batesian mimicry was first described past the pioneering naturalist Henry West. Bates. When an edible casualty animal comes to resemble, even slightly, a distasteful beast, natural selection favours those individuals that fifty-fifty very slightly amend resemble the distasteful species. This is because even a small degree of protection reduces predation and increases the chance that an individual mimic volition survive and reproduce. For case, many species of hoverfly are coloured blackness and yellow like bees, and are in consequence avoided by birds (and people).^[five]

Müllerian mimicry was kickoff described by the pioneering naturalist Fritz Müller. When a distasteful brute comes to resemble a more common distasteful beast, natural selection favours individuals that even very slightly ameliorate resemble the target. For example, many species of stinging wasp and bee are similarly coloured black and yellow. Müller's explanation of the mechanism for this was i of the starting time uses of mathematics in biological science. He argued that a predator, such as a young bird, must attack at to the lowest degree i insect, say a wasp, to learn that the blackness and yellow colours mean a stinging insect. If bees were differently coloured, the young bird would have to attack 1 of them also. But when bees and wasps resemble each other, the young bird demand only attack one from the whole group to learn to avoid all of them. So, fewer bees are attacked if they mimic wasps; the aforementioned applies to wasps that mimic bees. The result is common resemblance for mutual protection.^[39]

Lark [edit]

A praying mantis in deimatic or threat pose displays conspicuous patches of colour to startle potential predators. This is non warning coloration equally the insect is palatable.

Startle [edit]

Some animals such as many moths, mantises and grasshoppers, take a repertoire of threatening or startling behaviour, such every bit suddenly displaying conspicuous eyespots or patches of bright and contrasting colours, and so as to scare off or momentarily distract a predator. This gives the prey beast an opportunity to escape. The behaviour is deimatic (startling) rather than aposematic equally these insects are palatable to predators, so the warning colours are a barefaced, not an honest bespeak.^{[40] [41]}

Movement dazzle [edit]

Some prey animals such as zebra are marked with high-contrast patterns which possibly help to misfile their predators, such equally lions, during a chase. The bold stripes of a herd of running zebra have been claimed make information technology hard for predators to gauge the prey'due south speed and direction accurately, or to identify individual animals, giving the prey an improved chance of escape.^[42] Since dazzle patterns (such as the zebra'south stripes) make animals harder to catch when moving, but easier to discover when stationary, there is an evolutionary trade-off betwixt dazzle and cover-up.^[42] There is evidence that the zebra'due south stripes could provide some protection from flies and biting insects.^[43]

Physical protection [edit]

Many animals accept dark pigments such as melanin in their pare, eyes and fur to protect themselves confronting sunburn^[44] (damage to living tissues caused by ultraviolet low-cal).^{[45] [46]} Another example of photoprotective pigments are the GFP-like proteins in some corals.^[47] In some jellyfish, rhizostomins have besides been hypothesized to protect against ultraviolet damage.^[48]

Temperature regulation [edit]

This frog changes its skin colour to control its temperature.

Some frogs such as Bokermannohyla alvarengai, which basks in sunlight, lighten their peel color when hot (and darkens when cold), making their peel reflect more than heat and so avoid overheating.^[49]

Incidental coloration [edit]

The olm's blood makes it announced pink.

Some animals are coloured purely incidentally considering their claret contains pigments. For example, amphibians like the olm that live in caves may be largely colorless as colour has no role in that surroundings, but they show some cerise considering of the haem paint in their red blood cells, needed to bear oxygen. They too have a little orange coloured riboflavin in their skin.^[50] Human albinos and people with fair skin accept a similar colour for the same reason.^[51]

Mechanisms of colour product in animals [edit]

Animal coloration may be the effect of any combination of pigments, chromatophores, structural coloration and bioluminescence.^[52]

Coloration by pigments [edit]

The crimson pigment in a flamingo'south plumage comes from its diet of shrimps, which become it from microscopic algae.

Pigments are coloured chemicals (such every bit melanin) in animal tissues.^[52] For case, the Chill play a joke on has a white glaze in winter (containing little paint), and a brown coat in summer (containing more paint), an example of seasonal cover-up (a polyphenism). Many animals, including mammals, birds, and amphibians, are unable to synthesize nigh of the pigments that colour their fur or feathers, other than the brown or black melanins that requite many mammals their earth tones.^[53] For instance, the bright yellow of an American goldfinch, the startling orange of a juvenile cerise-spotted newt, the deep red of a cardinal and the pink of a flamingo are all produced past carotenoid pigments synthesized by plants. In the case of the flamingo, the bird eats pink shrimps, which are themselves unable to synthesize carotenoids. The shrimps derive their trunk colour from microscopic red algae, which like most plants are able to create their ain pigments, including both carotenoids and (green) chlorophyll. Animals that eat greenish plants do not become green, however, equally chlorophyll does not survive digestion.^[53]

Variable coloration by chromatophores [edit]

Fish and frog melanophores are cells that tin can change colour by dispersing or aggregating pigment-containing bodies.

Chromatophores are special pigment-containing cells that may modify their size, but more oft retain their original size but let the paint within them to get redistributed, thus varying the colour and blueprint of the brute. Chromatophores may respond to hormonal and/or neurobal command mechanisms, but direst responses to stimulation by visible light, UV-radiation, temperature, pH-changes, chemicals, etc. have also been documented.^[1] The voluntary control of chromatophores is known as metachrosis.^[52] For instance, cuttlefish and chameleons tin can speedily change their appearance, both for cover-up and for signalling, every bit Aristotle first noted over 2000 years agone:^[ii]

The octopus ... seeks its prey past so changing its colour as to render information technology like the colour of the stones adjacent to it; it does so also when alarmed.

—Aristotle

Squid chromatophores announced as black, brown, reddish and pinkish areas in this micrograph.

When cephalopod molluscs like squid and cuttlefish find themselves confronting a light groundwork, they contract many of their chromatophores, concentrating the pigment into a smaller area, resulting in a pattern of tiny, dense, merely widely spaced dots, appearing light. When they enter a darker environment, they let their chromatophores to expand, creating a pattern of larger night spots, and making their bodies announced dark.^[54] Amphibians such equally frogs take 3 kinds of star-shaped chromatophore cells in separate layers of their skin. The meridian layer contains 'xanthophores' with orange, red, or yellow pigments; the middle layer contains 'iridophores' with a silvery light-reflecting paint; while the lesser layer contains 'melanophores' with night melanin.^[53]

Structural coloration [edit]

Butterfly wing at dissimilar magnifications reveals microstructured chitin acting every bit diffraction grating.

While many animals are unable to synthesize carotenoid pigments to create blood-red and yellow surfaces, the light-green and blue colours of bird feathers and insect carapaces are unremarkably not produced by pigments at all, but by structural coloration.^[53] Structural coloration ways the production of color past microscopically-structured surfaces fine plenty to interfere with visible low-cal, sometimes in combination with pigments: for example, peacock tail feathers are pigmented dark-brown, but their structure makes them appear blue, turquoise and green. Structural coloration can produce the most vivid colours, often iridescent.^[52] For instance, the blue/dark-green gloss on the plume of birds such as ducks, and the majestic/blue/dark-green/red colours of many beetles and butterflies are created by structural coloration.^[55] Animals utilise several methods to produce structural colour, as described in the tabular array.^[55]

Mechanisms of structural colour product in animals

Mechanism	Structure	Instance
Diffraction grating	layers of chitin and air	Iridescent colours of butterfly wing scales, peacock feathers[55]
Diffraction grating	tree-shaped arrays of chitin	Morpho butterfly wing scales[55]
Selective mirrors	micron-sized dimples lined with chitin layers	Papilio palinurus, emerald swallowtail butterfly fly scales[55]
Photonic crystals	arrays of nano-sized holes	Cattleheart butterfly wing scales[55]
Crystal fibres	hexagonal arrays of hollow nanofibres	Aphrodita, sea mouse spines[55]
Deformed matrices	random nanochannels in spongelike keratin	Diffuse non-iridescent blueish of Ara ararauna, blueish-and-yellow macaw[55]
Reversible proteins	reflectin proteins controlled by electric accuse	Iridophore cells in Doryteuthis pealeii squid peel[55]

Bioluminescence [edit]

Bioluminescence is the production of lite, such as by the photophores of marine animals,^[56] and the tails of glow-worms and fireflies. Bioluminescence, like other forms of metabolism, releases energy derived from the chemical energy of food. A pigment, luciferin is catalysed by the enzyme luciferase to react with oxygen, releasing calorie-free.^[57] Comb jellies such every bit Euplokamis are bioluminescent, creating blueish and green light, especially when stressed; when disturbed, they secrete an ink which luminesces in the same colours. Since comb jellies are not very sensitive to low-cal, their bioluminescence is unlikely to be used to betoken to other members of the same species (e.1000. to concenter mates or repel rivals); more likely, the light helps to distract predators or parasites.^[58] Some species of squid have calorie-free-producing organs (photophores) scattered all over their undersides that create a sparkling glow. This provides counter-illumination camouflage, preventing the animal from appearing every bit a night shape when seen from below.^[59] Some anglerfish of the deep sea, where information technology is too nighttime to hunt by sight, contain symbiotic bacteria in the 'allurement' on their 'line-fishing rods'. These emit low-cal to attract casualty.^[60]

See also [edit]

• Albinism in biological science
• Chromatophore
• Canis familiaris coat colours and patterns
• Cat coat genetics
• Deception in animals
• Equine coat color
• Equine coat colour genetics
• Roan (colour)
• Fish coloration

References [edit]

1. ^ ^{a b} Meyer-Rochow, VB (2001). Fish chromatophores as sensors of environmental stimuli - Book=Sensory Biology of Jawed Fishes; editors Kapoor BG & Hara TJ; Science Publishers Enfield (NH), U.s.. pp. 317–334.
2. ^ ^{a b} Aristotle (c. 350 BC). Historia Animalium. IX, 622a: two–10. Cited in Borrelli, Luciana; Gherardi, Francesca; Fiorito, Graziano (2006). A catalogue of body patterning in Cephalopoda. Firenze University Press. ISBN 978-88-8453-377-7. Abstract
3. ^ ^{a b} Hooke, Robert (1665) Micrographia. Ch. 36 ('Observ. XXXVI. Of Peacoks, Ducks, and Other Feathers of Changeable Colours.'). J. Martyn and J. Allestry, London. Full text Archived 7 August 2016 at the Wayback Machine.
4. ^ ^{a b} Darwin, Charles (1859). On the Origin of Species, Ch. 4. John Murray, London. Reprinted 1985, Penguin Classics, Harmondsworth.
5. ^ ^{a b} Bates, Henry Walter (1863). The Naturalist on the River Amazons. John Murray, London.
6. ^ Mallet, James. "Eastward.B. Poulton (1890)". University College London. Retrieved 23 November 2012.
7. ^ Allen, J. A.; Clarke, B. C. (September 1984). "Frequency dependent selection: homage to Eastward. B. Poulton". Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 23 (1): 15–18. doi:x.1111/j.1095-8312.1984.tb00802.ten.
8. ^ ^{a b c} Poulton, Edward Bagnall (1890). The Colours of Animals, their significant and use, especially considered in the case of insects. Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner. London. pp. 331–334
9. ^ Beddard, Frank Evers (1892). Animal Coloration, An Business relationship of the Principal Facts and Theories Relating to the Colours and Markings of Animals. Swan Sonnenschein, London.
10. ^ Yost, Robinson M. "Poulton: Colours". Kirkwood Community College. Retrieved five Feb 2013.
11. ^ Poulton, Edward Bagnall (half-dozen Oct 1892). "Book Review: Animal Coloration: an Account of the Principal Facts and Theories relating to the Colours and Markings of Animals". Nature. 46 (1197): 533–537. Bibcode:1892Natur..46..533P. doi:ten.1038/046533a0. S2CID 3983153.
12. ^ Thayer, Abbott Handerson and Thayer, Gerald H. (1909). Concealing-Coloration in the Animal Kingdom. New York.
13. ^ Roosevelt, Theodore (1911). "Revealing and concealing coloration in birds and mammals". Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History. 30 (Article 8): 119–231. hdl:2246/470.
14. ^ Cott, 1940.
15. ^ Cott, 1940. p. 51
16. ^ Larson, Edward J. (2004). Development: The Remarkable History of a Scientific Theory. New York: Mod Library. pp. 121–123, 152–157. ISBN0-679-64288-9.
17. ^ Alfred Russel Wallace (2015) [1889]. Darwinism - An Exposition of the Theory of Natural Pick - With Some of Its Applications. Read Books. p. 180. ISBN978-ane-4733-7510-nine.
18. ^ Cuthill, I. C.; Székely, A. (2011). Stevens, Martin; Merilaita, Sami (eds.). Animal Camouflage: Mechanisms and Function. Cambridge Academy Press. p. fifty. ISBN978-i-139-49623-0.
19. ^ Mallet, James (July 2001). "Mimicry: An interface between psychology and evolution". PNAS. 98 (xvi): 8928–8930. Bibcode:2001PNAS...98.8928M. doi:x.1073/pnas.171326298. PMC55348. PMID 11481461.
20. ^ ^{a b c d e f} Forbes, 2009. pp. fifty–51
21. ^ Cott, H. B. 1940
22. ^ Forbes, 2009. pp. 72–73
23. ^ Brian Morton; John Edward Morton (1983). "The coral sub-littoral". The Body of water Shore Ecology of Hong Kong. Hong Kong Academy Press. pp. 253–300. ISBN978-962-209-027-ix.
24. ^ Voss, Gilbert L. (2002). "The crustaceans". Seashore Life of Florida and the Caribbean area. Courier Dover Publications. pp. 78–123. ISBN978-0-486-42068-4.
25. ^ Sazima, Ivan; Grossman, Alice; Sazima, Cristina (2004). "Hawksbill turtles visit moustached barbers: Cleaning symbiosis between Eretmochelys imbricata and the shrimp Stenopus hispidus". Biota Neotropica. 4: 1–6. doi:10.1590/S1676-06032004000100011.
26. ^ Darwin, Charles (1874). The Descent of Human being. Heinemann, London.
27. ^ Miller, G. F. (2000). The Mating Mind: How sexual choice shaped the evolution of human nature. Heinemann, London.
28. ^ ^{a b} Forbes, 2009. p. 52 and plate 24.
29. ^ Cott, 1940. p. 250.
30. ^ Bowers, M. Deane; Brownish, Irene L.; Wheye, Darryl (1985). "Bird Predation equally a Selective Agent in a Butterfly Population". Evolution. 39 (1): 93–103. doi:x.2307/2408519. JSTOR 2408519. PMID 28563638.
31. ^ Forbes, 2008. p. 200.
32. ^ Cott, 1940, p. 241, citing Gilbert White.
33. ^ "Black, White and Stinky: Explaining Coloration in Skunks and Other Boldly coloured Animals". Academy of Massachusetts Amberst. 27 May 2011. Retrieved 21 March 2016.
34. ^ ^{a b} Lindström, Leena; Alatalo, Rauno V.; Mappes, Johanna (1999). "Reactions of hand-reared and wild-caught predators toward warningly coloured, gregarious, and conspicuous prey" (PDF). Behavioral Ecology. 10 (3): 317–322. doi:10.1093/beheco/10.3.317.
35. ^ Cott, 1940. pp. 277–278.
36. ^ Cott, 1940. pp. 275–276.
37. ^ Cott, 1940. p. 278.
38. ^ Cott, 1940. pp. 279–289.
39. ^ Forbes, 2009. pp. 39–42
40. ^ Stevens, Martin (2005). "The role of eyespots as anti-predator mechanisms, principally demonstrated in the Lepidoptera". Biological Reviews. 80 (4): 573–588. doi:10.1017/S1464793105006810. PMID 16221330. S2CID 24868603.
41. ^ Edmunds, Malcolm (2012). "Deimatic Behavior". Springer. Retrieved 31 December 2012.
42. ^ ^{a b} Stevens, Martin; Searle, William T. L.; Seymour, Jenny East.; Marshall, Kate L. A.; Ruxton, Graeme D. (25 November 2011). "BMC Biology: Motion dazzle". Motion Dazzle and Camouflage as Distinct Anti-predator Defenses. BMC Biology. 9: 9:81. doi:10.1186/1741-7007-nine-81. PMC3257203. PMID 22117898.
43. ^ Gill, Victoria (9 February 2012). "BBC nature". Zebra stripes evolved to keep bitter flies at bay . Retrieved xxx April 2012.
44. ^ World Health Organization, International Agency for Enquiry on Cancer "Solar and ultraviolet radiation" IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, Volume 55, November 1997.
45. ^ Proctor, P. H.; McGinness, J. East. (May 1986). "The function of melanin". Athenaeum of Dermatology. 122 (5): 507–508. doi:10.1001/archderm.1986.01660170031013. PMID 3707165.
46. ^ Hill, H. Z. (January 1992). "The function of melanin or half dozen blind people examine an elephant". BioEssays. 14 (1): 49–56. doi:ten.1002/bies.950140111. PMID 1546980. S2CID 36665467.
47. ^ Gittins, John R.; D'Angelo, Cecilia; Oswald, Franz; Edwards, Richard J.; Wiedenmann, Jörg (January 2015). "Fluorescent poly peptide‐mediated color polymorphism in reef corals: multicopy genes extend the adaptation/acclimatization potential to variable low-cal environments". Molecular Environmental. 24 (2): 453–465. doi:10.1111/mec.13041. ISSN 0962-1083. PMC4949654. PMID 25496144.
48. ^ Lawley, Jonathan W.; Carroll, Anthony R.; McDougall, Carmel (24 September 2021). "Rhizostomins: A Novel Pigment Family From Rhizostome Jellyfish (Cnidaria, Scyphozoa)". Frontiers in Marine Scientific discipline. 8: 752949. doi:ten.3389/fmars.2021.752949. ISSN 2296-7745.
49. ^ Tattersall, Thou. J.; Eterovick, P. C.; de Andrade, D. 5. (Apr 2006). "Tribute to R. Grand. Boutilier: skin colour and body temperature changes in basking Bokermannohyla alvarengai (Bokermann 1956)". Periodical of Experimental Biology. 209 (Office seven): 1185–1196. doi:10.1242/jeb.02038. PMID 16547291.
50. ^ Istenic, Fifty.; Ziegler, I. (1974). "Riboflavin equally "pigment" in the skin of Proteus anguinus L.". Naturwissenschaften. 61 (12): 686–687. Bibcode:1974NW.....61..686I. doi:10.1007/bf00606524. PMID 4449576. S2CID 28710659.
51. ^ "colour Variations in Light and Dark Skin" (PDF). Prentice-Hall. 2007. Retrieved 27 November 2012.
52. ^ ^{a b c d} Wallin, Margareta (2002). "Nature's Palette" (PDF). Nature's Palette: How Animals, Including Humans, Produce Colours. Bioscience-explained.org. 1 (ii): 1–12. Retrieved 17 November 2011.
53. ^ ^{a b c d} Hilton, B., Jr. (1996). "South Carolina Wild fauna". Animal Colours. Hilton Pond Center. 43 (4): 10–fifteen. Retrieved 26 November 2011.
54. ^ Kozloff, Eugene N. (1983) Seashore Life of the Northern Pacific Coast: Illustrated Guide to Northern California, Oregon, Washington and British Columbia. University of Washington Press. 2d edition.
55. ^ ^{a b c d e f g h i} Ball, Philip (May 2012). "Nature'south colour Tricks". Scientific American. pp. 60–65. Retrieved 23 April 2012.
56. ^ Shimomura, Osamu (2012) [2006]. Bioluminescence: chemical principles and methods. Globe Scientific. ISBN9789812568014.
57. ^ Kirkwood, Scott (Spring 2005). "Park Mysteries: Deep Blueish". National Parks Magazine. National Parks Conservation Association. pp. 20–21. ISSN 0276-8186. Archived from the original on 14 July 2009. Retrieved 26 November 2011.
58. ^ Haddock, S.H.D.; Case, J.F. (April 1999). "Bioluminescence spectra of shallow and deep-sea gelled zooplankton: ctenophores, medusae and siphonophores" (PDF). Marine Biology. 133 (3): 571–582. doi:10.1007/s002270050497. S2CID 14523078. Archived from the original (PDF) on 16 May 2008. Retrieved 25 Nov 2011.
59. ^ Widder, E. "Midwater Squid, Abralia veranyi". Smithsonian Ocean. Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History.
60. ^ Piper, Ross. Extraordinary Animals: An Encyclopedia of Curious and Unusual Animals. Greenwood Printing, 2007.

Sources [edit]

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Cover-up.

• Cott, Hugh Bamford (1940). Adaptive Coloration in Animals. Methuen, London.
• Forbes, Peter (2009). Dazzled and Deceived: Mimicry and Camouflage. Yale, New Haven and London. ISBN 0300178964

External links [edit]

• Theme effect 'Creature coloration: product, perception, function and application' (Imperial Social club)
• NatureWorks: Coloration (for children and teachers)
• HowStuffWorks: How Creature Camouflage Works
• University of British Columbia: Sexual Selection (a lecture for Zoology students)
• Nature's Palette: How animals, including humans, produce colours

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_coloration

Posted by: evanshiscia.blogspot.com

Share this post